May 07, 2013
The most significant thing I learned in my intro Philosophy class was
never taught by the professor, but in a heated debate with a
fellow-student named Bryan. You see, at the time I was basically a
humanist. I believed that all (or at least an overwhelming majority of)
people were basically good, and would turn away from their evil ways
once someone showed them that they had gone wrong. I also believed
(based on God-knows what evidence) that this was a realistic task,
though large. I really thought that people in general would be amenable
to moral re-education.
Naturally, our class soon enough got to debating the classic dichotomyBridesmaid Dresses UK of whether people are born little angels and then corrupted by the
influence of this fallen world, or little devils who need to be whipped
into shape before they're fit for human company. Naive creature that I
was, I came down mostly on Rousseau's side of the debate, and I was
heartily offended when Bryan stated (with great confidence and finality)
that the whole debate was missing the point, and that people are
basically stupid. So stupid as to be un-trainable, even. (So much for
their moral re-education!) Then the class got a whole lot more
interesting, largely because Bryan was the only worthy opponent in that
class of about 40 students.
(ASIDE: He was majoring in computer science, which impliesCocktail Dresses UK that he'd been taught enough logic to construct a coherent argument that didn't contradict itself. A rare talent.)
And
so: battle was joined. Initially, over Tim Hortons' coffee in the
Loyola building, with Bryan hammering on my blind faith in humanity. His
weapon of choice was humanity's long and illustrious history of making
the same mistakes over and over. ForParty Dresses a few examples: war, terrorism, torture, religious persecution, the
endless string of corrupt bastards who rise to positions of power, and
the number of people who keep getting into the same hopeless
relationship again and again with different people. The battle was later
continued at his place, over rye and ginger. I fought valiantly, but
soon enough it became evident that my opponent was never going to run
out of ammunition. He had a better case than I did. Thus, my
intellectual integrity forced me to take his position seriously.
Posted by: zhenzhen at
02:49 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 389 words, total size 3 kb.
33 queries taking 0.0811 seconds, 49 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.